The Influence of the Fraud Hexagon Theory Factors on the Financial Statement Fraud of Companies in the Transportation and Logistics Sector

Authors

  • Putu Sarita Nareswari Universitas Udayana
  • Ni Luh Sari Widhiyani Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54066/ijmre-itb.v3i1.2923

Keywords:

Fraud Hexagon Theory, Financial Statement Fraud, Transportation, Logistics Sector

Abstract

This study aims to examine the influence of fraud hexagon theory factors on financial statement fraud in transportation and logistics sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2018 to 2022. The fraud hexagon theory elements in this study are proxied by financial targets, ineffective supervision, auditor changes, board of directors changes, frequency of CEO photo appearances, and State-Owned Enterprises. The sample in this study was 19 companies that had been selected using purposive sampling techniques. The number of observations in this study was 95 observations. The data analysis carried out in the study was panel data regression analysis using EViews 12 software as a data analysis tool. The results of the analysis showed that financial targets had a positive effect on financial statement fraud. However, ineffective supervision, auditor changes, board of directors changes, frequency of CEO photo appearances, and state-owned enterprise variables were shown to have no effect on financial statement fraud. This study provides theoretical implications in the form of additional information about the influence of financial targets on financial statement fraud and this study also provides practical implications for company leaders to pay more attention and consider the company's financial targets as one of the indicators that can be used to detect financial statement fraud.

References

Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2018). Fraud prevention initiatives in the Nigerian public sector: Understanding the relationship of fraud incidences and the elements of fraud triangle theory. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(2), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2015-0008

ACFE Indonesia Chapter. (2020). Indonesia Fraud Survey 2019.

Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Hexagon fraud: Detection of fraudulent financial reporting in state-owned enterprises in Indonesia. Economies, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013

Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., Helmina, M. R. A., Hapsari, D. I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2023). Detecting fraudulent financial reporting using the fraud hexagon model: Evidence from the banking sector in Indonesia. Economies, 11(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11010005

Agusputri, H., & Sofie, S. (2019). Factors influencing fraudulent financial reporting using Pentagon fraud analysis. Journal of Information, Taxation, Accounting, and Public Finance, 14(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.25105/jipak.v14i2.5049

Agustina, R. D., & Pratomo, D. (2019). The influence of Pentagon fraud in detecting financial reporting fraud. Scientific Journal of Management, Economics, & Accounting (MEA), 3(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.vol3.iss1.pp44-62

Alfarago, D., & Mabrur, A. (2022). Does fraud hexagon components promote fraud in Indonesia? Ethiconomy, 21(2), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v21i2.24653

Apriliana, S., & Agustina, L. (2017). The analysis of fraudulent financial reporting determinant through fraud Pentagon approach. Journal of Accounting Dynamics, 9(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v9i2.4036

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2024). Occupational fraud 2024: A report to the nations. https://legacy.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2024/

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (n.d.). Fraud 101: What is fraud? https://www.acfe.com/fraud-resources/fraud-101-what-is-fraud

Bader, A. A., Hajar, Y. A. A., Weshah, S. R. S., & Almasri, B. K. (2024). Predicting risk of and motives behind fraud in financial statements of Jordanian industrial firms using hexagon theory. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(120), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17030120

Bank Indonesia. (2024). Indonesian economic report 2023. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/laporan/Pages/LPI_2023.aspx

Central Bureau of Statistics. (2024). Indonesian economy in Q4-2023 grows 5.04 percent (y-on-y). https://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2024/02/05/2379/ekonomi-indonesia-triwulan-iv-2023-tumbuh-5-04-persen--y-on-y-.html

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.

Crowe Howarth. (2011). Why the fraud triangle is no longer enough.

Damayani, F., Wahyudi, T., & Yuniatie, E. (2017). The influence of Pentagon fraud on financial report fraud in infrastructure companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014–2016. Accountability: Journal of Accounting Research and Development, 11(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.29259/ja.v11i2.8936

Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2010). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x

Devi, P. N. C., Widanaputra, A. A. G. P., Budiasih, I. G. A. N., & Rasmini, N. K. (2021). The effect of fraud Pentagon theory on financial statements: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. 8(3), 1163–1169. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.1163

Fitri, F. A., Syukur, M., & Justisa, G. (2019). Do the fraud triangle components motivate fraud in Indonesia? Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 13(4), 63–72.

Fortuna, R. D., & Syofyan, E. (2020). The influence of company age, company size, auditor reputation, and auditor change. Journal of Accounting Exploration, 2(3), 2912–2928. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v2i3.259

Ghozali, I., & Ratmono, D. (2017). Multivariate analysis and econometrics (2nd ed.). Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hartono, J. (2017). Misguided business research methodology and experiences (6th ed.). BPFE-Yogyakarta.

Hugo, J. (2019). Effectiveness of Beneish M-Score model and F-Score model in detecting financial report fraud. Journal of Economics and Business Sciences, 3(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmieb.v3i1.2296

Imtikhani, L., & Sukirman, S. (2021). Determinants of fraudulent financial statements through the perspective of fraud hexagon theory in mining companies. Journal of Business Accounting, 19(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v19i1.3654

Indriaty, L., & Thomas, G. N. (2023). Analysis of hexagon fraud model, the SCCORE model influencing fraudulent financial reporting on state-owned companies of Indonesia. Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 11(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2023-0060

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Khamainy, A. H., Amalia, M. M., Cakranegara, P. A., & Indrawati, A. (2022). Financial statement fraud: The predictive relevance of fraud hexagon theory. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 5(1), 110–133. https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v5i1.249

Kuang, T. M., Agustinus, A., Cahyadi, A., & Purwati, M. A. (2024). Narcissism and love of money: Risk factors for financial report fraud. Owner: Research & Accounting Journal, 8(4), 4149–4159. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v8i4.2285

Kusumawati, E., Yuliantoro, I. P., & Putri, E. (2021). Pentagon fraud analysis in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. Indonesian Accounting and Finance Research, 6(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v6i1.14646

Kusumayanti, N. P. E., & Widhiyani, N. L. S. (2017). The influence of opinion shopping, disclosure and public accounting firm reputation on going concern audit opinion. E-Journal of Accounting, 18(3), 2290–2317.

M. Rizkiawan, & Subagio, S. (2022). Fraud hexagon and corporate governance analysis on the potential fraud in financial statements. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(2), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i2.909

Mukaromah, I., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2021). Fraud hexagon theory in detecting financial report fraud in banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015–2019. Scientific Journal of Computerized Accounting, 14(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.51903/kompak.v14i1.355

Naldo, R. R., & Widuri, R. (2023). Fraudulent financial reporting and fraud hexagon: Evidence from infrastructure companies in ASEAN. Economic Affairs (New Delhi), 68(3), 1455–1468. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.3.2023.14

Napitupulu, R. B., Simanjuntak, T. P., Hutabarat, L., Damanik, H., Harianja, H., Sirait, R. T. M., & Tobing, C. E. R. L. (2021). Business research, engineering and data analysis with SPSS-STATA-EVIEWS (1st ed.). Madenatera.

Nurbaiti, A., & Cipta, A. T. (2022). Fraud hexagon to detect indications of financial statement fraud. E-Journal of Accounting, 32(10), 2977–2990. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2022.v32.i10.p06

Omukaga, K. O. (2020). Is the fraud diamond perspective valid in Kenya? Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3), 810–840. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2019-0141

Downloads

Published

2025-01-16

How to Cite

Putu Sarita Nareswari, & Ni Luh Sari Widhiyani. (2025). The Influence of the Fraud Hexagon Theory Factors on the Financial Statement Fraud of Companies in the Transportation and Logistics Sector. International Journal of Management Research and Economics, 3(1), 456–477. https://doi.org/10.54066/ijmre-itb.v3i1.2923