Penerapan Metode Clustering dengan Algoritma K-Means pada Pengelompokkan Peminatan Mata Kuliah

Authors

  • Deti Karmanita UPI YPTK
  • Billy Hendrik UPI YPTK PADANG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54066/jikma.v1i6.1028

Keywords:

Data Mining, Cluetering, K-Mens

Abstract

Choosing a concentration in student academic activities is not an easy thing because it depends on interests, talents and desires, therefore careful consideration is needed so that students do not make a mistake in choosing the desired concentration. This often happens when final semester students do their final assignment but it does not match their field of ability. Choosing a concentration haphazardly without careful consideration can have a negative impact on students, namely difficulty in absorbing lecture material. Therefore, a special method is needed that students can use to determine student concentration. One of the methods used is the K-Means method. The K-Means algorithm is a non-hierarchical method that initially takes a number of population components to become the initial cluster center. At this stage the cluster center is selected randomly from a set of data populations. Next, K-Means tests each component in the data population and marks the component to one of the cluster centers that has been defined depending on the minimum distance between components and each cluster. with a total of 100 data records, using cluster centers C1 70, 82.5, 85, C2 70, 75, 80 and C3 80, 85, 80 produces 6 iterations with the results of Cluster 1. Students are recommended to enter the Expert Systems Concentration. In the calculation above, there are 3 students who are included in cluster 1. Cluster 2 Students are recommended to enter the multimedia programming concentration. In the calculation above, there are 20 students included in cluster 2. Cluster 3 Students are recommended to enter the Cisci and Network Concentration. In the calculation above, there are 34 students included in cluster 3. From validation testing it is obtained: initial and final centroid of the first attribute: 5.83%, second attribute: 31.44%, third attribute: 35.89%. It is hoped to develop concentration clustering for Information Systems majors using other methods, not only the K-Means method, and determining concentration majors using variables other than academic grades, such as non-academic achievement scores which are linear with the study program. In the future, the concentration determination system will be carried out in the information systems study program.

References

D. Dillenberger, P. Novotny, Q. Zhang, P. Jayachandran, H. Gupta, S. Hans, et al., Blockchain analytics and artificial intelligence, IBM J. Res. Dev. 63(2/3) (2019) 5:1–5:14.

Darmi, Y. D., & Setiawan, A. (2016). Penerapan metode clustering k-means dalam pengelompokan penjualan produk. Jurnal Media Infotama, 12(2).

Dhuhita, W. M. P. (2015). Clustering Menggunakan Metode K-Means untuk Menentukan Status Gizi Balita. Jurnal Informatika, 15(2), 160-174.

IEEE standard for extensible event stream (XES) for achieving interoperability in event logs and event streams, in: IEEE Std 1849-2016, 2016, pp. 1–50, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2016.7740858

Intermedia, B. (2020). Data Mining : Definisi, Fungsi, Metode dan Penerapannya. Teknologi.

J. Mendling, I. Weber, W.M.P.v.d. Aalst, J.v. Brocke, C. Cabanillas, F. Daniel, S. Debois, C.D. Ciccio, M. Dumas, S. Dustdar, et al., Blockchains for business process management - challenges and opportunities, ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. 9 (1) (2018) 4:1–4:16.

Khomarudin, A. N. (2018). Teknik Data Mining : Algoritma K-Mean Clustering. 4-5.

L. Moctar-M’Baba, M. Sellami, W. Gaaloul, M.F. Nanne, Blockchain logging for process mining: A systematic review, in: 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS, Virtual Event / Maui, Hawaii, USA, January 4-7, ScholarSpace, 2022, pp. 1–10.

N.Y. Wirawan, B.N. Yahya, H. Bae, Incorporating transaction lifecycle information in Anomali process discovery, in: Blockchain Technology for IoT Applications, Springer Singapore, 2021, pp. 155–172.

Priati, & Fauzi, A. (2018). Data Mining dengan Teknik Clustering Menggunakan Algoritma K-Means pada Data Transaksi Supersore. 1.

R. Hobeck, C. Klinkmüller, D. Bandara, I. Weber, Process mining on Anomali data: A case study of Augur, in: 19th International Conference, BPM, Rome, Italy, Springer, 2021, pp. 306–323.

R. Mühlberger, S. Bachhofner, C. Di Ciccio, L. García-Bañuelos, O. Pintado, Extracting event logs for process mining from data stored on the blockchain, in: BPM International Workshops, Vienna, Austria, in: LNBIP, vol.362, Springer, 2019, pp. 690–703.

Rahajo, Budi. (2012). Modul Pemrograman Web (HTML, PHP, & MySql). Informatika

Selvida, D. (2019). Analisis Klasifikasi Data dengan Kombinasi Metode K-Means dan Rapid Centroid Estimation (RCE).

Wakhidah, N. (2010). Clustering menggunakan k-means algorithm. Jurnal Transformatika, 8(1), 33-39.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-23

How to Cite

Deti Karmanita, & Billy Hendrik. (2023). Penerapan Metode Clustering dengan Algoritma K-Means pada Pengelompokkan Peminatan Mata Kuliah. Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa, 1(6), 01–10. https://doi.org/10.54066/jikma.v1i6.1028