Potensi Inovasi Indonesia di Tengah Bonus Demografi: Menjawab Tantangan Global

Syakirul Niam; Betty Silfia Ayu Utami

doi:10.54066/jmbe-itb.v2i4.2542

Authors

Syakirul Niam UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Betty Silfia Ayu Utami UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54066/jmbe-itb.v2i4.2542

Keywords:

Demographic, Productivity, Innovation

Abstract

Indonesia’s demographic bonus, marked by a large working-age population, offers significant potential to drive economic growth and innovation. However, despite this demographic advantage, Indonesia faces challenges in workforce quality, investment in research and development (R&D), and technological infrastructure. According to the Global Innovation Index 2023, Indonesia ranks 62nd out of 132 countries in innovation. The low proportion of skilled workers and the lack of formal training programs within companies exacerbate the innovation gap. To fully leverage its demographic potential, Indonesia needs comprehensive policy reforms in education and R&D, increased investment in human capital, and strengthened technological infrastructure. Without these improvements, the demographic bonus risks turning into a long-term burden rather than a catalyst for innovation and economic growth.

References

Abdul Ony Setiawan. (2016). Analisis perubahan struktur ekonomi di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Universitas Airlangga. https://repository.unair.ac.id/33119/

Andarista, F., Hariyani, D. S., & Fauzi, R. U. A. (2022). Pengaruh brand ambassador dan promosi terhadap minat beli brand Erigo melalui brand image sebagai variabel intervening. Journal of Current Research in Business and Economics, 01(02), 36–44.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2023). Bonus demografi dan visi Indonesia emas 2045.

Dewi, M. R., & Dinanti, L. A. (2019). Worker productivity in three provinces of Java and Bali. Seminar Nasional Official Statistics, 2019(1), 1–7.

Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2023). Global innovation index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty (16th ed.). WIPO.

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humaniora, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1

Fleischhauer, K. (2007). A review of human capital theory: Microeconomics.

Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Pembangunan Manusia dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia (Kemenko PMK). (n.d.). Pemerintah berkomitmen wujudkan bonus demografi yang berkualitas. 2023. https://www.kemenkopmk.go.id/pemerintah-berkomitmen-wujudkan-bonus-demografi-yang-berkualitas

Kuncoro, M. (1997). Oligopolis dan strategi bisnis. BPFE.

Lewis, A. (1954). Pembangunan ekonomi dengan penawaran kerja yang tidak terbatas. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–162.

M. Fajar Amir, A., & Jaedun, A. (2024). Model kemitraan triple helix antara universitas, industri, dan pemerintah dalam melaksanakan kurikulum berbasis outcome di era disrupsi. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 12(1).

Puspitarini, R. C. (2018). Trickle-down economics Arthur Lewis dan ekonomi. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 1(1).

Rahayu, T., Triwahyono, B., & Muliawati, A. (2023). Perancangan user interface (UI) monitoring tumbuh kembang anak berbasis Android dengan metode CATWOE. Jurnal Bela Negara UPN Veteran Jakarta, 1(2), 70–82.

Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102.

Schilirò, D. (2020). The growth conundrum: Paul Romer’s endogenous growth. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Harper & Brothers.

Stiglitz, J. E. (n.d.). Whither socialism? MIT Press.

Sudiantini, D., Ayu, M. P., Aswan, M. C. A. S., Prastuti, M. A., & Melani, A. (2023). Transformasi digital: Dampak, tantangan, dan peluang untuk pertumbuhan ekonomi digital. Trending: Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 1(3), 21–30.

Todaro, M. P. (2001). Economic development in the third world. Longman.

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (n.d.). Global innovation index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty.