Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Web-Based Credit Approval: A Study of TOPSIS, MABAC, WASPAS, and MAUT Methods

Kadek Indah Permataa; Desy Purnami Singgih Putria; Gusti Made Arya Sasmitab

doi:10.54066/jptis.v3i1.3152

Authors

Kadek Indah Permataa Udayana University
Desy Purnami Singgih Putria Udayana University
Gusti Made Arya Sasmitab Udayana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54066/jptis.v3i1.3152

Keywords:

Decision Support System, TOPSIS, MABAC, WASPAS, MAUT

Abstract

The decision-making process in granting credit involves analyzing a series of alternatives using certain criteria.. The goal is to find the best alternative that meets these criteria. One method that can be used in the decision making process is Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) or Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). There are many MCDM or MCDA methods that can be used for decision making. This research aims to test the MCDM methods, namely TOPSIS, MABAC, WASPAS and MAUT in making decisions regarding credit acceptance. The dataset used in this research is data regarding credit acceptance with 5 criteria and 100 attributes. The method study was carried out by ranking all alternatives based on the best alternative and then comparing the ranking results of the four methods using Spearman and Kendall Tau rank correlations. And carry out sensitivity tests on the four methods to find the most sensitive method. The results of the comparison of the four methods show that there is a strong correlation between the MABAC and WASPAS methods. The sensitivity test results show that the TOPSIS method is the most sensitive method. Based on the correlation results, it can be concluded that the MABAC and WASPAS methods are the methods that produce the most similar rankings. Meanwhile, the most sensitive method is obtained by the TOPSIS method.

References

L. A. Sihombing and Y. Nuraeni, “Tindak Pidana Perbankan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undangundang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perbankan,” 2019.

R. Diva Riyanto and M. Yunus, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Berbasis Web Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” Jurnal Manajemen Informatikan, 2021, doi: 10.34010/jamika.v11i2.493.

A. Mubarok, H. Dwipratama Suherman, Y. Ramdhani, S. Topiq, and U. Bsi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Pemberian Kredit Dengan Metode TOPSIS,” JURNAL INFORMATIKA, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/ji/article/view/4739

N. A. U. Nurhajanti Muljadi, W. Widekso, and W. Tisno Atmojo, “Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan TOPSIS dengan VIKOR dalam Pemilihan Hubungan Kerjasama,” 2022.

R. Sasri Dwitama, “Pemilihan Metode Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Menggunakan Pendekatan Rank Similarity Simulation (RSS),” 2019.

S. Bandyopadhyay, “Decision Support System; Tools and Techniques,” Mar. 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003307655.

S. Bandyopadhyay, “A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Technique Considering Various Essential Characteristics,” 2021, doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-608280/v1.

B. Zlaugotne, L. Zihare, L. Balode, A. Kalnbalkite, A. Khabdullin, and D. Blumberga, “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison,” Environmental and Climate Technologies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 454–471, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.2478/rtuect-2020-0028.

V. D. Iswari, F. Y. Arini, and M. A. Muslim, “Decision Support System for the Selection of Outstanding Students Using the AHP-TOPSIS Combination Method,” Lontar Komputer : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi, p. 40, May 2019, doi: 10.24843/lkjiti.2019.v10.i01.p05.

F. R. Darmawan, E. L. Amalia, and U. D. Rosiani, “Penerapan Metode Topsis pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Kota yang Menerapkan Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar yang di Sebabkan Wabah Corona,” Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi (Justin), vol. 9, no. 2, p. 250, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.26418/justin.v9i2.43896.

D. I. Božanić, D. S. Pamučar, and S. M. Karović, “Application the MABAC method in support of decision-making on the use of force in a defensive operation,” Tehnika, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 129–136, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.5937/tehnika1601129b.

Y. Hasan, “KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Peserta FLS2N SMAN 1 Perbaungan Menggunakan Metode MABAC,” Media Online, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://djournals.com/klik

C. Priatama and I. Pratama, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan BLT menggunakan Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS),” 2022.

W. Kartika Murti and A. Triayudi, “Penentuan Mahasiswa Berprestasi dengan Menerapkan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT),” Jurnal Sistem Komputer dan Informatika (JSON) Hal: 122−, vol. 130, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.30865/json.v5i1.6823.

S. Nugroho, A. Syahrul, and R. Vusvitasari, “Kajian Hubungan Koefisien Korelasi Pearson (r), Spearman-rho (ρ), Kendall-Tau (τ), Gamma (G) , dan Somers ( ),” Jurnal Gradien.

D. N. Nafi’, A. Mulyanto, and M. G. Wonoseto, “Perbandingan Sensitivitas Metode SAW Dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Ustadz Teladan Ponpes Wahid Hasyim Yogyakarta,” Fountain of Informatics Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2548–5113, 2021, doi: 10.21111/fij.v6i1.4670.