Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran Kognitif Pada Tes Objektif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54066/jupendis.v2i4.2159Keywords:
cognitive assessment, objective test, matching testAbstract
Assessment in education is very important to determine the achievement of educational goals, with continuous evaluation referring to comprehensive results. One of the assessment domains is the cognitive domain, which measures students' mastery of knowledge and critical thinking abilities, including problem solving. This research examines instruments for assessing cognitive learning outcomes in description and objective tests through literature study, using references from books, journals and related government regulatory documents. The research results show that the cognitive domain includes mental activities that focus on the ability to connect and combine various ideas or methods to solve problems. Written objective tests, which consist of true-false, multiple choice, matching, and complete/short answer, are important for accurately measuring cognitive aspects in the learning process.
References
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). *Taksonomi tujuan pendidikan: Klasifikasi tujuan pendidikan, Handbook I: Ranah kognitif.* New York: David McKay Company.
Eryanto, H. dan M. (2022). Perencanaan Pengajaran (Pertama). UNJ PRESS.
Fitz Patrick, B., Hawboldt, J., Doyle, D., & Genge, T. (2015). Alignment of learning objectives and assessments in therapeutics courses to foster higherorder thinking. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe79110
Magdalena, I., Aqmarani, A., Nurhalisa, N., & Syahra, N. P. (2023). Perbandingan Penggunaan Tes Objektif dan Tes Subjektif terhadap Hasil Belajar. YASIN, 3(4), 710-720.
Putri, H., Susiani, D., Wandani, N. S., & Putri, F. A. (2022). Instrumen penilaian hasil pembelajaran kognitif pada tes uraian dan tes objektif. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2).
RI, M. P. D. K. (2013). Permendikbud No 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. 2011, 1–6. Penilaian pada Pembelajran, 3(1), 48-62.
Rosyidi, D. (2020). Teknik dan Instrumen Asesmen Ranah Kognitif. Tasyri` : Jurnal Tarbiyah-Syari`ah-Islamiyah, 27(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.52166/tasyri.v27i1. 79
Setiadi, H. (2016). PelaksanaanA penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.71 73
Sudjana, Nana. 2006. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. (diakses pada tanggal 20 Desember 2019).
Wahyuni, A.A.Y, Suarni, Kt, D. (2014). Pengaruh penggunaan bentuk tes terhadap hasil belajar membaca bahasa indonesia dengan kovariabel motivasi berprestasi siswa. Program Pscasatrjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 5
Zaenal, A. (2016). Evaluasi pembelajaran. In Remaja Rosdakarya.
