Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas Tinggi dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita pada Meteri Bangun Datar

Authors

  • Debby Yuliana Sinaga Universitas HKBP Nomensen Pematang Siantar
  • Grace Tessalonika Juliarta Universitas HKBP Nomensen Pematang Siantar
  • Sarah Sihombing Universitas HKBP Nomensen Pematang Siantar
  • Sonia Sonia Universitas HKBP Nomensen Pematang Siantar
  • Chintya Saragi Universitas HKBP Nomensen Pematang Siantar
  • Monalisa Sion Siallagan Universitas HKBP Nomensen Pematang Siantar
  • Jelita Septri Ananda Siahaan Universitas HKBP Nomensen Pematang Siantar
  • Mahatma Mahatma Universitas HKBP Nomensen Pematang Siantar
  • Leo Samri Simanjuntak Universitas HKBP Nomensen Pematang Siantar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54066/jupendis.v3i1.2918

Keywords:

Conceptual Understanding, Instructional Strategies, Learning Difficulties, Mathematics

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students' mathematical learning difficulties based on high (KMT), medium (KMS), and low (KMR) ability levels. Results revealed that KMT subjects demonstrated strong conceptual understanding but struggled with contextual comprehension of problems. KMS subjects could grasp concepts well but faced challenges in applying formulas to contextual problems. Meanwhile, KMR subjects experienced significant difficulties in understanding concepts, applying formulas, and solving contextual problems altogether. The study highlights the importance of implementing instructional strategies focused on strengthening conceptual understanding and contextual problem-solving to enhance students' skills.

References

Anderson, R. C. (2019). Schema theory revisited: Applications for educational contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 245–256.

Bruner, J. S. (2018). The process of education: Updated edition. Harvard University Press.

Flavell, J. H. (2019). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–917.

Hadi, S. (2005). Pendekatan matematika realistik. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

National Research Council. (2020). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press.

Ng, C., & Lee, K. (2009). Representation in mathematics education. Journal of Educational Psychology.

Piaget, J. (2020). The psychology of intelligence: A contemporary interpretation. Routledge.

Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.

Rostika, A. (2023). Peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa SD dalam pembelajaran matematika. EduHumaniora, 15(3), 123-130.

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Cognitive load theory (2nd ed.). Springer.

Vygotsky, L. S. (2020). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (2018). Scaffolding: A framework for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(3), 429–436.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-15

How to Cite

Debby Yuliana Sinaga, Grace Tessalonika Juliarta, Sarah Sihombing, Sonia Sonia, Chintya Saragi, Monalisa Sion Siallagan, Jelita Septri Ananda Siahaan, Mahatma Mahatma, & Leo Samri Simanjuntak. (2025). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas Tinggi dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita pada Meteri Bangun Datar. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN ILMU SOSIAL (JUPENDIS), 3(1), 332–340. https://doi.org/10.54066/jupendis.v3i1.2918