Kompetensi Auditor Sebagai Faktor Pendukung Audit Investigasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54066/jura-itb.v2i3.2188Keywords:
Auditor Competency, Investigative Audit, Supporting FactorsAbstract
Fraud detection is urgent for many companies or agencies. Cases of fraud and irregularities are increasingly rampant in Indonesia. Cases of corruption, misappropriation of assets, abuse of authority, and fraudulent financial statements often occur in various government agencies and companies. This study aims to determine auditor competence as a supporter of investigative audits. An interpretive qualitative method with a phenomenological approach was used in this study. Data collection techniques were carried out through interviews and observation. Data analysis was carried out by compiling questions, recording interview results, and analyzing and organizing them. The results showed that auditor competence has an influence on investigative audits. Qualified forensic analysis skills, interview skills to obtain information, and critical thinking to solve every problem in the field. Auditor competence in terms of understanding and knowledge related to regulations and laws is very important because it is the basis or guideline for conducting investigative audits. Because auditor competence is an important factor in supporting investigative audits, competency development is very necessary. Training, seminars, or continuing education can be a form of development that can be implemented by auditors. Qualified competence will improve the quality of the audit.
References
Adriansyah, R., & Setyo Budiwitjaksono, G. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh Opini Going Concern Dan Audit Tenure Terhadap Hasil Kualitas Audit [Analysis Of The Influence Of Going Concern Opinion And Audit Tenure On Audit Quality Results]. Retrieved from www.idx.co.id
Alfiar, A. (2022). Pengaruh Audit Forensik, Audit Investigasi, Kompetensi Auditor, Profesionalisme, Dan Kecerdasan Spiritual Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud [The Influence of Forensic Audit, Investigation Audit, Auditor Competence, Professionalism, and Spiritual Intelligence on Fraud Prevention]. BPKP Perwakilan Jawa Tengah, 15(1), 159–169.
Ardiansyah, R. J. (2024). Teknik Pengumpulan Data Dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah [Data Collection Techniques and Instruments for Scientific Research]. Retrieved from http://ejournal.yayasanpendidikandzurriyatulquran.id/index.php/ihsan
Aulia Haqq, A. P. N., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2020). Fraud Pentagon for Detecting Financial Statement Fraud. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 22(3), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i3.1788
Dewi, I. R., & Ratnawati, T. (2024). Pengaruh Kemampuan Auditor, Skeptisme Profesional Auditor, Teknik Audit Dan Whistleblower Terhadap Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Audit Investigasi [The Effect of Auditor Competence, Professional Auditor Skepticism, Audit Techniques, and Whistleblower on the Effectiveness of Investigative Audit Implementation]. Jom Fekon, 2(1), 1–15.
Faizah, N., Budiwitjaksono, G. S., & Vendy, V. (2024). Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia Memoderasi Determinan Senjangan Anggaran [Human Resource Quality Moderates Budget Gap Determinants]. Ekonomis: Journal of Economics and Business, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v8i1.1065
Irmadani, A. S. (2024). Pengaruh Teknik-Teknik Audit dan Kemampuan Auditor terhadap Pelaksanaan Audit Investigatif [The Influence of Audit Techniques and Auditor Competence on Investigative Audit Implementation]. 2(2).
Maryani, N., & Sastradipraja, U. (2022). Peranan Audit Investigatif dalam menjadikan Bukti Audit sebagai Bukti Hukum untuk Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi [The Role of Investigative Audit in Making Audit Evidence as Legal Evidence for Proof of Criminal Acts of Corruption]. Portofolio: Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi, 17(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.54783/portofolio.v17i2.199
Nurdin, N., & Pettalongi, S. S. (2022). Menggunakan Paradigma Studi Kasus Kualitatif Interpretatif Online dan Offline Untuk Memahami Efektivitas Penerapan E-Procurement [Using Interpretative Qualitative Case Study Paradigm Online and Offline to Understand the Effectiveness of E-Procurement Implementation]. 13(2), 155–168.
Pratiwi, A. E., & Ratnawati, T. (2024). Studi Literatur: Pengaruh Kompetensi, Pengalaman, Dan Independen Auditor Terhadap Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Prosedur Audit Investigatif [Literature Study: The Influence of Competence, Experience, and Auditor Independence on the Effectiveness of Investigative Audit Procedures]. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 5(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.34005/akrual.v5i2.3608
Rinendy, J., & Sitompul, G. O. (2021). Faktor Kompetensi Auditor Investigatif yang Memprediksi Efektivitas Audit Investigasi Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan Perwakilan Provinsi Jawa Barat [Factors of Investigative Auditor Competence Predicting the Effectiveness of Investigative Audit of the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency, West Java Province]. Jurnal Terapan Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis, 4(2), 165–178.
Rohma, F. F. (2023). Contribution Regional Tax And Retributions In The Tourism Sector. Retrieved from https://jkp.ejournal.unri.ac.id
Setyo Budiwitjaksono, G., Yuhertiana, I., & Romaisyah, L. (2020). The Synergy Of Ethical Aspects And State Defence Character To Accounting Competency. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 05(03), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.46609/ijsser.2020.v05i03.010
Shonhadji, N. (2021). Penggunaan Teori Sosial Dalam Paradigma Interpretif Pada Penelitian Akuntansi [The Use of Social Theory in Interpretive Paradigm in Accounting Research]. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi. Retrieved from http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/jka
Susanto, H., et al. (2022). Sustaining Investigative Audit Quality through Auditor Competency and Digital Forensic Support: A Consensus Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215141
Thomas, G. N., & Indriaty, L. (2023). Analysis Of Factors Influencing The Occupation Of Fraud Detection. 27(02), 359–379.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128
Wahyuni, & Budiwitjaksono, G. (2017). Fraud Triangle Sebagai Pendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan [Fraud Triangle as a Detector of Financial Statement Fraud].
