Literature Review: Pengaruh Independensi, Skeptisme, dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54066/jrea-itb.v2i2.1852Keywords:
Independence, Skepticism, Accountability, Audit QualityAbstract
This literature review investigates the influence of independence, skepticism, and accountability on audit quality based on previous research. Independence is considered a key element in the audit process that can ensure the auditor's objectivity in conducting assessments. Skepticism, as the auditor's critical and alert attitude towards the information presented, is also considered important in improving audit quality. In addition, accountability refers to the auditor's responsibility in ensuring compliance with audit standards and professional ethics. Previous studies show that independence, skepticism, and accountability have a significant impact on audit quality. Auditors who have high independence tend to carry out more objective evaluations of the information being audited, thereby improving the quality of the financial reports produced. In addition, high skepticism allows auditors to be more alert to potential errors or fraud, thereby increasing their ability to detect discrepancies or irregularities in financial reports. Furthermore, strong accountability ensures that auditors are accountable for their decisions and actions, which can encourage them to conduct audits with high integrity and professionalism. Although many studies have confirmed the positive relationship between independence, skepticism, and accountability and audit quality, there is still room for further research in different contexts, such as specific industries or countries that have unique regulatory and cultural characteristics. The implication of this literature is the importance of strengthening these factors in audit practice in order to increase public trust in the financial reports presented.
Downloads
References
Akuntabilitas Auditor, P., Auditor, S., Bidang, D., Klien, I., Karakteristik, D., Terhadap, P., Audit, K., Kasus, S., Kantor, P., Daerah, A. P., Bandung, K., Wedi, ) R, Kusumah, R., Arnan, S. G., & Asikin, B. (2023). The Effect of Auditor Accountability, Auditor Specialization in the Client Industry, and Personal Characteristics on Audit Quality (Case Study at the Bandung City Regional Public Accounting Firm). Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(6), 9192–9101. http://journal.yrpipku.com/index.php/msej
Anam, H., Tenggara, F. O., & Sari, D. K. (2021). Pengaruh independensi, integritas, pengalaman dan objektifitas auditor terhadap kualitas audit. Forum Ekonomi, 23(1), 96–101.
Ardini, L. (2010). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Akuntabilitas Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Majalah Ekonomi Tahun XX, 3, 6–7.
Ariyani, Z. (2019). PENGARUH AKUNTABILITAS DAN PROFESIONALISME AUDITOR TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di DKI Jakarta). Jurnal Sosial Budaya, 1(1), 43–56.
DeAngelo. (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics.
Dianatasari, I. G. A. A. D., Endiana, I. D. M., & Kumalasari, P. D. (2022). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Karakteristik Personal Auditor, Pengalaman Auditor, Dan Skeptisme Profesional Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Bali. Jurnal Karya Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 2(1), 2396–2406.
Emeritus, P., Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., Columbus, B., New, I., San, Y., Upper, F., River, S., Cape, A., Dubai, T., Madrid, L., Munich, M., Montreal, P., Delhi, T., Sao, M. C., Sydney, P., Kong, H., Singapore, S., & Tokyo, T. (2014). An Integrated Approach Auditing and Assurance Services F(Fourteenth Edition) Professor of Enterprise Risk Management Prentice Hall The Auditing Profession.
Ermayanti, D. (2017). Pengaruh Emotional Quotient, Pengalaman Auditor Dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Eksis: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 12(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.26533/eksis.v12i2.109
Fajri, K. R. (2020). PENGARUH SKEPTISME PROFESIONAL, INDEPENDENSI, AKUNTABILITAS, FEE AUDIT TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT.
Farhan, D. (2019). Etika dan Akuntabilitas Profesi Akuntan Publik. Empatdua Media.
Fitri Rahayu, P., & Armereo, C. (2019). Pengaruh Independensi, Akuntabilitas, Time pressure dan Due Professional Care Terhadap Kualitas Audit pada Inspektorat Musi Banyuasin Sekayu. Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 14(2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.30630/jam.v14i2.27
Gaa, J. C. (1984). The effects of accountability on audit staff performance, The Accounting Review.
Hilman, N., Laekkeng, M., & Amiruddin. (2021). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Skeptisme Profesional, Kompetensi Auditor, Dan E-Audit Terhadap Kualitas Hasil Audit Pada Kantor Inspektorat Daerah Kota Makassar. Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 3(2), 303–332.
Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., & Earley, C. E. (2013). The Effects of Professional Skepticism on the Fraud Detection Skills of Forensic and Non-Forensic Accounting Majors: A Research Note. Behavioral Research in Accounting.
Kristianto, G. B. (2020). Pengaruh Independendi terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Motivasi Auditor sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 22(1), 53–68. http://www.jp.feb.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/jeba/article/view/1564
Laksita, A. D., & Sukirno, S. (2019). Pengaruh Independensi, Akuntabilitas, Dan Objektivitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 8(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v8i1.24497
Linda, D. A. (2023). SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 1(3), 17–34.
Muhammad Attamimi Fikri, F. (2015). FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI SKEPTISME PROFESIONAL AUDITOR Akhmad Riduwan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia (STIESIA) Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu & Riset Akuntansi, 4(7), 1–22.
Murti, G. T., & Firmansyah, I. (2017). Pengaruh Independensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 9(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v9i2.9543
Ningsih, A. N. S. A., Kirana, D. J., & Andriyanto, W. A. (2020). Pengalaman Audit, Fee Audit, dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Prosiding BIEMA (Business Management, Economic, and Accounting National Seminar), 1, 1460–1476.
Nurfadillah, N., & Nurhuda, N. (2020). Pengaruh Due Professional Care dan Akuntabilitas Auditor terhadap Kualitas Audit. JEMMA (Journal of Economic, Management and Accounting), 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.35914/jemma.v3i1.325
Pradana, B. A., Trisnaningsih, S., Pembangunan, U., Veteran, N. ", & Timur, J. (2022). the Effect of Accountability and Professionalism on Audit Quality With Due Professional Care As Moderating Variables Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Dan Profesionalisme Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Due Professional Care Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. COSTING:Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting, 6(1), 475–482.
Rabihah, A., Zakaria, A., & Nasution, H. (2023). Pengaruh akuntabilitas , tekanan anggaran waktu , dan moral reasoning terhadap kualitas audit. Fair Value : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(12), 1–8.
Rahayu, N. K. S., & Suryanawa, I. K. (2020). Pengaruh Independensi, Profesionalisme, Skeptisme Profesional, Etika Profesi dan Gender Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada KAP di Bali. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(3), 686. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2020.v30.i03.p11
Rahayu, R. A. (2020). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional Audit dan Keahlian Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu, 13(2), 242. https://doi.org/10.35448/jrat.v13i2.9129
Rahayu, T., & Suryono, B. (2016). Pengaruh Independensi Auditor , Etika Auditor , Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntasi, 5(April), 1–16.
Rahim, S., Sari, R., Wardaningsi, W., & Muslim, M. (2020). Pengaruh Integritas, Kompetensi dan Skeptisme Auditor terhadap Kualitas Audit. Profita: Komunikasi Ilmiah Dan Perpajakan, 13(2), 241–254.
Ratha, I. M. D. K., & Ramantha, I. W. (2015). Pengaruh Due Professional Care , Akuntabilitas , Kompleksitas Audit , Dan Time Budget Pressure Terhadap Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal AKuntansi, 13(January), 311–339.
Sangadah, L. (2022). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Auditor, Independensi Auditor, Dan Profesionalisme Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Owner, 6(2), 1137–1143. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i2.636
Suci, N., Samin, & Anita, N. (2019). PENGARUH SKEPTISISME PROFESIONAL AUDITOR , KOMPETENSI , Suci Nugrahaeni Samin Anita Nopiyanti Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “ Veteran ” Jakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, 21(2), 181–198.
Sugiarmini, N. L. A., & Datrini, L. K. (2017). Pengaruh Skeptisme Profesional, Independensi, Kompetensi, Etika, Dan Role Stress Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Kantor Bpk Ri Perwakilan Provinsi Bali. Jurnal KRISNA: Kumpulan Riset Akuntansi, 9(1), 1–14.
Surabaya, P. D. I., Ec, D., & Ratnawati, D. (2020). Professional Care Dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit ( Studi Kasus Pada Kantor Akuntan. Professional Care Dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit ( Studi Kasus Pada Kantor Akuntan, 1, 25–35.
Wiratama, W. J., & Ketut, B. (2015). Pengaruh Independensi, Pengalaman Kerja, Due Professional Care Dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 10, 91–106.
Xiong, G., & Xiao, Z. (2017). The magnetic resonance imaging appearances in Kienböck’s disease. Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume, 42(1), 91–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193416664491
Yoanita, S., & Farida. (2019). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Independensi Auditor, Kompetensi, Due Professional Care, Objektivitas, Etika Profesi dan Integritas Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Fakultass Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, Jalan Tidar Ni 21 Magelang Jawa Tengah, 289–301.
Zaputra, A. R. R., & Marlina. (2022). Pengaruh Independensi, Time Budget Pressure Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Perbankan, 16(1), 609–627.
